The British racing team and Formula One would benefit from any conclusive outcome in the championship battle involving Norris and Oscar Piastri getting resolved on the track rather than without reference to the pit wall with the championship finale kicks off at the Circuit of the Americas on Friday.
With the Marina Bay event’s doubtless extensive and stressful post-race analyses dealt with, the Woking-based squad will be hoping for a reset. Norris was likely more than aware about the historical parallels of his riposte toward his upset colleague at the last race weekend. During an intense championship duel against Piastri, that Norris invoked a famous Senna well-known quotes was lost on no one yet the occurrence that provoked his comment differed completely from incidents characterizing Senna's great rivalries.
“If you fault me for just going on the inside of a big gap then you should not be in Formula One,” Norris said regarding his first-lap move to pass which resulted in the cars colliding.
The remark appeared to paraphrase Senna’s “Should you stop attempting an available gap that exists then you cease to be a true racer” defence he provided to the racing knight following his collision with Alain Prost at Suzuka in 1990, securing him the championship.
While the spirit remains comparable, the wording marks where parallels stop. The late champion confessed he had no intent to allow Prost to defeat him through the first corner whereas Norris did try to execute a clean overtake at the Marina Bay circuit. In fact, it was a perfectly valid effort which received no penalty despite the minor contact he had with his team colleague as he went through. This incident was a result of him clipping the car driven by Verstappen in front of him.
Piastri reacted furiously and, significantly, immediately declared that Norris gaining the place was “unfair”; suggesting that the two teammates clashing was forbidden by team protocols for racing and Norris should be instructed to give back the place he had made. The team refused, but it was indicative that in any cases of contention, each would quickly ask to the team to intervene in their favor.
This is part and parcel from McLaren's commendable approach to allow their racers compete one another and to try to maintain strict fairness. Quite apart from tying some torturous knots in setting precedents about what defines fair or unfair – under these conditions, now covers misfortune, tactical calls and racing incidents like in Marina Bay – there remains the issue regarding opinions.
Of most import to the title race, six races left, Piastri is ahead of Norris by 22 points, each racer's view exists on fairness and when their perspectives might split from the team's stance. Which is when the amicable relationship between the two could eventually – become a little bit more Senna-Prost.
“It will reach a point where minor points count,” commented Mercedes boss Wolff post-race. “Then they’ll start to calculate and re-calculations and I guess aggression will increase a bit more. That's when it begins to get interesting.”
For the audience, during this dual battle, increased excitement will likely be appreciated as a track duel instead of a spreadsheet-based arbitration regarding incidents. Especially since for F1 the alternative perception from these events isn't very inspiring.
Honestly speaking, McLaren are making the correct decisions for their interests and it has paid off. They clinched their 10th constructors’ title at Marina Bay (though a great achievement overshadowed by the controversy from their drivers' clash) and in Andrea Stella as squad leader they have an ethical and upright commander who truly aims to do the right thing.
Yet having drivers competing for the title looking to the pitwall to decide matters is unedifying. Their competition ought to be determined through racing. Chance and fate will have roles, but better to let them simply go at it and observe outcomes naturally, than the impression that every disputed moment will be pored over by the team to ascertain whether they need to intervene and then cleared up afterwards behind closed doors.
The examination will increase with every occurrence it is in danger of potentially making a difference that could be critical. Already, after the team made their drivers swap places in Italy because Norris had endured a delayed stop and Piastri believing he was treated unfairly with the strategy call at Hungary, where Norris triumphed, the spectre of a fear of favouritism also emerges.
Nobody desires to witness a championship constantly disputed over perceived that fairness attempts had not been balanced. Questioned whether he felt the team had managed to do right toward both racers, Piastri responded he believed they had, but mentioned it's a developing process.
“There’s been some difficult situations and we discussed a number of things,” he said post-race. “But ultimately it's educational with the whole team.”
Six races stay. The team has minimal room for error for last-minute adjustments, so it may be better to just stop analyzing and step back from the fray.
A dedicated writer and theologian passionate about sharing faith-based insights and fostering community connections.
News
By Margaret Houston
•
05 Nov 2025
News
By Margaret Houston
•
05 Nov 2025
News
By Margaret Houston
•
04 Nov 2025
News
By Margaret Houston
•
04 Nov 2025
News
By Margaret Houston
•
04 Nov 2025
News
By Margaret Houston
•
04 Nov 2025