These times present a very unusual phenomenon: the inaugural US procession of the babysitters. They vary in their skills and attributes, but they all possess the identical objective – to avert an Israeli violation, or even devastation, of the delicate ceasefire. Since the hostilities concluded, there have been few occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s representatives on the ground. Only recently saw the presence of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all arriving to execute their assignments.
Israel keeps them busy. In only a few days it initiated a set of strikes in the region after the deaths of a pair of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers – resulting, based on accounts, in many of Palestinian fatalities. Multiple officials demanded a resumption of the war, and the Knesset enacted a early measure to take over the West Bank. The US stance was somewhere ranging from “no” and “hell no.”
However in more than one sense, the American government seems more concentrated on upholding the current, uneasy stage of the truce than on progressing to the next: the rebuilding of Gaza. Regarding that, it seems the United States may have ambitions but little tangible strategies.
Currently, it is uncertain when the planned international governing body will truly assume control, and the same applies to the appointed military contingent – or even the composition of its personnel. On Tuesday, Vance declared the United States would not dictate the membership of the international unit on Israel. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet persists to refuse one alternative after another – as it acted with the Ankara's offer lately – what happens then? There is also the contrary point: which party will determine whether the forces favoured by the Israelis are even prepared in the mission?
The matter of the duration it will take to disarm the militant group is just as vague. “The expectation in the leadership is that the international security force is will now take charge in demilitarizing Hamas,” remarked the official recently. “That’s may need a period.” Trump only reinforced the uncertainty, declaring in an interview recently that there is no “hard” deadline for Hamas to lay down arms. So, hypothetically, the unnamed participants of this still unformed global force could enter Gaza while Hamas members still remain in control. Would they be dealing with a administration or a militant faction? Among the many of the issues surfacing. Others might wonder what the verdict will be for everyday civilians as things stand, with Hamas persisting to attack its own political rivals and dissidents.
Current developments have afresh highlighted the blind spots of local media coverage on the two sides of the Gaza border. Every outlet seeks to analyze all conceivable angle of the group's violations of the ceasefire. And, usually, the situation that the organization has been stalling the return of the bodies of slain Israeli hostages has monopolized the coverage.
On the other hand, coverage of civilian fatalities in Gaza stemming from Israeli strikes has obtained scant focus – or none. Consider the Israeli retaliatory actions after Sunday’s southern Gaza occurrence, in which two soldiers were killed. While local sources reported 44 fatalities, Israeli television pundits criticised the “light response,” which focused on solely facilities.
This is typical. Over the recent weekend, Gaza’s media office charged Israeli forces of infringing the ceasefire with Hamas multiple times since the truce began, resulting in the loss of dozens of individuals and injuring another many more. The allegation appeared insignificant to most Israeli news programmes – it was merely ignored. Even reports that 11 individuals of a local household were killed by Israeli soldiers recently.
Gaza’s civil defence agency reported the individuals had been seeking to go back to their dwelling in the Zeitoun neighbourhood of the city when the vehicle they were in was fired upon for allegedly going over the “yellow line” that demarcates areas under Israeli military authority. That yellow line is invisible to the naked eye and is visible only on plans and in official documents – sometimes not obtainable to everyday people in the territory.
Even this occurrence barely got a reference in Israeli news outlets. A major outlet referred to it shortly on its website, quoting an Israeli military spokesperson who said that after a suspicious vehicle was identified, forces discharged alerting fire towards it, “but the vehicle persisted to move toward the soldiers in a manner that caused an immediate risk to them. The troops engaged to neutralize the danger, in accordance with the truce.” No casualties were claimed.
Given this framing, it is no surprise a lot of Israelis believe the group solely is to at fault for infringing the ceasefire. This belief could lead to prompting appeals for a stronger stance in Gaza.
Eventually – maybe in the near future – it will no longer be adequate for US envoys to play kindergarten teachers, instructing Israel what not to do. They will {have to|need
A dedicated writer and theologian passionate about sharing faith-based insights and fostering community connections.
News
By Margaret Houston
•
05 Nov 2025
News
By Margaret Houston
•
05 Nov 2025
News
By Margaret Houston
•
04 Nov 2025
News
By Margaret Houston
•
04 Nov 2025
News
By Margaret Houston
•
04 Nov 2025
News
By Margaret Houston
•
04 Nov 2025